Monday 6 June 2011

On An Unusual Monday

Today I'd normally be at work, but I had the day off due to the Dragon Boat Festival. There was a power cut in my neighborhood all afternoon, so I spent it laid back up in a tree at the park reading Conrad's "Heart Of Darkness" whilst the dogs slept below among the tree roots.

I should do that more often.

Later... With no electricity and hence no internet, what was I missing? This, Iowahawk's hilarious satirization of the Weinergate nonsense in the style of a vaguely Raymond Chandler-esque pulp comic. Choice quote:
"My name is Rather. And I'm a dick."

10 comments:

  1. Totally out of context, but I've become a "troll" as well, evidently. Just proves what I've been saying: one is worthy of some when and only when they agree, either silently or vocally. Once they have a dissenting opinion--and a pretty strong one at that--not the least bit of irony is to be tolerated.

    It appears you and I are now in the same boat when it comes to another Mike we both know. . . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. "...one is worthy of some when and only when they agree, either silently or vocally..."

    I saw the exchange at Turton's place, but - I'm not entirely sure what you're saying here Nathan... have you been banned, or are you just commenting on the responses you got?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You got banned from Facebook, or a Facebook group?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not aware of any group that Michael Turton hosts. I suspect Nathan is referring to Michael Turton's profile. It's absurd, because Turton publishes all sorts of nonsense and things in reply to what I say on my status updates/links. He apparently never subscribed to the theory that those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. But then, I wouldn't want to live in a glass house anyway. Still, I don't censor comments, unless they are really unnecessarily sensitive, in a more personal way. I know you don't feel the same way, Michael, because you once actually censored a comment when I was writing in defense. Not that you needed any defending, but that's beside the point.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "I know you don't feel the same way, Michael, because you once actually censored a comment when I was writing in defense."

    Yes, and you know why I did that because I explained it to you at the time; that comment was deleted because it was way out of proportion - in my estimation, if not in yours.

    But you're certainly not banned.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nathan,

    Presumably you mean he (Turton, right?) blocked you from viewing his Facebook page.

    I'm curious; what was so "nasty" about the email he sent you?

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Using his own information against him, ridiculing him at his own place..."

    Nothing wrong with any of that in my book.

    "Oh, and something about hiding behind a progressive facade..."

    Oh that's probably his prelude to calling you a member of the "neoliberal illuminati" or some other moonshine club.

    ReplyDelete

Comment moderation is now in place, as of April 2012. Rules:

1) Be aware that your right to say what you want is circumscribed by my right of ownership here.

2) Make your comments relevant to the post to which they are attached.

3) Be careful what you presume: always be prepared to evince your point with logic and/or facts.

4) Do not transgress Blogger's rules regarding content, i.e. do not express hatred for other people on account of their ethnicity, age, gender, sexual orientation or nationality.

5) Remember that only the best are prepared to concede, and only the worst are prepared to smear.