tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post6889176345232195114..comments2023-04-16T23:43:11.235+08:00Comments on Mirror Signal Move: On An Unusual MondayMike Faganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08745281285031316740noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-84754696718765062272011-06-13T22:57:11.855+08:002011-06-13T22:57:11.855+08:00"Using his own information against him, ridic...<i>"Using his own information against him, ridiculing him at his own place..."</i><br /><br />Nothing wrong with any of that in my book. <br /><br /><i>"Oh, and something about hiding behind a progressive facade..."</i><br /><br />Oh that's probably his prelude to calling you a member of the "neoliberal illuminati" or some other moonshine club.Mike Faganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08745281285031316740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-69423719226877325852011-06-13T17:59:00.127+08:002011-06-13T17:59:00.127+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nathan W. Novak (李漢聲)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09142094539803664003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-20545078377596338502011-06-12T00:35:41.458+08:002011-06-12T00:35:41.458+08:00Nathan,
Presumably you mean he (Turton, right?) b...Nathan,<br /><br />Presumably you mean he (Turton, right?) blocked you from viewing his Facebook <i>page</i>.<br /><br />I'm curious; what was so "nasty" about the email he sent you?Mike Faganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08745281285031316740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-56767267088497401432011-06-11T23:29:35.489+08:002011-06-11T23:29:35.489+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nathan W. Novak (李漢聲)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09142094539803664003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-70836390066162350012011-06-07T22:49:13.132+08:002011-06-07T22:49:13.132+08:00"I know you don't feel the same way, Mich...<i>"I know you don't feel the same way, Michael, because you once actually censored a comment when I was writing in defense."</i><br /><br />Yes, and you know why I did that because I explained it to you at the time; that comment was deleted because it was way out of proportion - <i>in my estimation</i>, if not in yours. <br /><br />But you're certainly not banned.Mike Faganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08745281285031316740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-30214021476112885122011-06-07T21:39:53.341+08:002011-06-07T21:39:53.341+08:00I'm not aware of any group that Michael Turton...I'm not aware of any group that Michael Turton hosts. I suspect Nathan is referring to Michael Turton's profile. It's absurd, because Turton publishes all sorts of nonsense and things in reply to what I say on my status updates/links. He apparently never subscribed to the theory that those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. But then, I wouldn't want to live in a glass house anyway. Still, I don't censor comments, unless they are really unnecessarily sensitive, in a more personal way. I know you don't feel the same way, Michael, because you once actually censored a comment when I was writing in defense. Not that you needed any defending, but that's beside the point.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15907060405795620941noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-2557101267491930462011-06-07T18:14:09.908+08:002011-06-07T18:14:09.908+08:00You got banned from Facebook, or a Facebook group?...You got banned from Facebook, or a Facebook group?Mike Faganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08745281285031316740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-1506689407387697502011-06-07T13:11:46.583+08:002011-06-07T13:11:46.583+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nathan W. Novak (李漢聲)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09142094539803664003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-45490904339303042982011-06-06T22:10:31.206+08:002011-06-06T22:10:31.206+08:00"...one is worthy of some when and only when ...<i>"...one is worthy of some when and only when they agree, either silently or vocally..."</i><br /><br />I saw the exchange at Turton's place, but - I'm not entirely sure what you're saying here Nathan... have you been banned, or are you just commenting on the responses you got?Mike Faganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08745281285031316740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2840508226007630755.post-7717598563639261432011-06-06T21:42:27.816+08:002011-06-06T21:42:27.816+08:00Totally out of context, but I've become a &quo...Totally out of context, but I've become a "troll" as well, evidently. Just proves what I've been saying: one is worthy of some when and only when they agree, either silently or vocally. Once they have a dissenting opinion--and a pretty strong one at that--not the least bit of irony is to be tolerated.<br /><br />It appears you and I are now in the same boat when it comes to another Mike we both know. . . .Nathan W. Novak (李漢聲)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09142094539803664003noreply@blogger.com