"...targeted a specific group and therefore has no claim to free speech."If this statement is meant in a positivist, legal sense then it is false as Taiwan does not have the necessary hate speech legislation under which speech deemed to be targeted at a specific group could be prohibited.
If it is intended as a normative statement, i.e. that Ms Hung should not be entitled to defend herself on the right to freedom of speech, because certain categories of opinion should be outlawed, then it needs to be said - Cole has outed himself as an opponent of freedom of speech and a fundamentally illiberal, progressive authoritarian.
On the video itself, of course I agree that Hung Su-chu's behaviour and remarks toward the old man were wrong, wicked, aggressive and stupid. But that is my opinion. I do not think she and others like her should be prevented from expressing such views in public, only that we the public should be free to respond in kind - or not at all. What is important is that we have a choice and the freedom to make our own decisions and make up our own minds.
"If you can be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you can be told what to say or think."
Your life is your own, and nobody else can live it for you...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment moderation is now in place, as of April 2012. Rules:
1) Be aware that your right to say what you want is circumscribed by my right of ownership here.
2) Make your comments relevant to the post to which they are attached.
3) Be careful what you presume: always be prepared to evince your point with logic and/or facts.
4) Do not transgress Blogger's rules regarding content, i.e. do not express hatred for other people on account of their ethnicity, age, gender, sexual orientation or nationality.
5) Remember that only the best are prepared to concede, and only the worst are prepared to smear.