"...there have been some 50 experimental wells across Europe to date. None – not a single one – appears to have flowed at a rate that would make them commercially viable...Now consider this table released by the UK government's own Department of Energy and Climate Change and attend to the comparative values for thickness...
"...The explanation is geology. Shales in Europe are generally thinner and deeper, and therefore much more expensive to tap, than those that have been successfully exploited in the United States. And Britain looks likely to be one of the less promising prospects in Europe because its shales are typically among the thinnest."
Yes - the shale gas reserves in the north of England are 6,000 feet across compared to the few hundred or so for some of the more profitable reserves in the U.S. - that is to say, they are literally an order of magnitude thicker than the U.S. reserves and yet Rawnsley does not mention this.
Because, presumably, he is rather more interested in "journalism" than facts. The UK media is full of people like this, and unfortunately it is no better (it may even be worse) here in Taiwan.
Via Nick Grealy.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment moderation is now in place, as of April 2012. Rules:
1) Be aware that your right to say what you want is circumscribed by my right of ownership here.
2) Make your comments relevant to the post to which they are attached.
3) Be careful what you presume: always be prepared to evince your point with logic and/or facts.
4) Do not transgress Blogger's rules regarding content, i.e. do not express hatred for other people on account of their ethnicity, age, gender, sexual orientation or nationality.
5) Remember that only the best are prepared to concede, and only the worst are prepared to smear.